Fascism and Freedom

There are two extremes: Laissez faire and absolute fascism. Middle ground between these is where many people reside, however most can be boiled down to favoring one or the other. People can support having some aspects fasciszing and others be more siding towards freedom. Everything affects everyone- In some minute way or another, all actions have a connection with all other actions. Now, Fascism doesn’t work unless it’s absolute fascism- The fascism of the Leviathan. The Leviathan’s control dictates everything as according to one ruler, which has nothing to do with the freedom of others. However, with absolute freedom, one being’s freedom is curtailed and infringed upon by another’s freedom. For example, if I had the freedom to cage a man, my action would take the freedom of that man away. All actions, in some form or another, require some investment of a force or tangible object, and either this investment or the results of the action itself have echoing repercussions upon all other actions. The concept of true freedom is impossible unless there is a single being in a vacuum, and even then the limitations of said vacuum would prevent absolute freedom. If true freedom is an impossibility, then we must look at absolute fascism. Absolute fascism is just as much of a fantasy as absolute freedom is- by the definitions of fascism you must have the Leviathan to control others- And then the Leviathan isn’t affected by fasciszing, and instead has absolute freedom. It’s the paradoxical relationship between freedom and fascism that makes the plurality so intriguing. You can’t have either in absolutes, and each only holds meaning when compared to the other.